Which is faster, symmetric or asymmetric encryption?

Symmetric encryption is far faster and is used for bulk data. Asymmetric encryption is much slower and is used mainly for key exchange and digital signatures.

Which type is used to encrypt large amounts of data?

Symmetric encryption (for example AES). It is fast enough for large volumes of data; asymmetric encryption is too slow for that.

Domain 1.0 · General Security Concepts

Symmetric vs Asymmetric Encryption

Q: Why does TLS use both symmetric and asymmetric encryption?

TLS uses asymmetric encryption to securely exchange a shared symmetric session key, then switches to fast symmetric encryption for the actual data. This hybrid approach gets asymmetric's safe key exchange and symmetric's speed.

Q: How many keys does each use?

Symmetric uses one shared secret key for both encryption and decryption. Asymmetric uses a matched pair: a public key and a private key.

One shared key or a public/private pair? Here's the difference, when each is used, and why TLS quietly uses both — explained for the Security+ exam.

The short answer

Symmetric encryption uses one shared secret key for both encryption and decryption — it's fast, but both sides need the same key. Asymmetric encryption uses a pair of keys (a public key and a private key) — it's slow, but it solves the problem of safely sharing keys and enables digital signatures.

Symmetric encryption

The same key locks and unlocks the data. Because the math is simple, it's very fast and ideal for encrypting large amounts of data (files, disks, network traffic).

Keys: one shared secret.
Examples: AES, ChaCha20, (older) 3DES.
The catch: key distribution — how do you get the shared key to the other side securely without an attacker intercepting it?

Asymmetric encryption

Each party has a mathematically linked public/private key pair. Anything encrypted with the public key can only be decrypted with the matching private key (and vice versa for signatures). The public key can be shared openly; the private key is kept secret.

Keys: a public key + a private key.
Examples: RSA, ECC (elliptic curve), Diffie-Hellman (key exchange).
Superpowers: it solves key exchange (no need to pre-share a secret) and enables digital signatures and non-repudiation.
The catch: it's much slower, so it's impractical for bulk data.

Side by side

	Symmetric	Asymmetric
Keys	One shared secret	Public + private pair
Speed	Fast	Slow
Best for	Bulk data (files, disks, traffic)	Key exchange & digital signatures
Examples	AES, ChaCha20	RSA, ECC, Diffie-Hellman
Main challenge	Distributing the shared key	Performance

Why TLS (HTTPS) uses both

This is the classic exam scenario. TLS is a hybrid: it uses asymmetric encryption at the start to safely exchange a shared symmetric session key, then switches to fast symmetric encryption for the actual web traffic. You get asymmetric's safe key exchange and symmetric's speed.

Exam tips: If a question asks what encrypts large amounts of data quickly → symmetric (AES). If it asks how two parties exchange a key over an untrusted network or how to sign something → asymmetric. If it describes needing both speed and safe key exchange (like TLS) → the hybrid approach.

Test yourself in the free Kestrel Exams app

Exam-weighted Security+ SY0-701 practice — offline, no ads, no tracking.

Open Kestrel Exams →

Frequently asked questions

Which is faster, symmetric or asymmetric?

Symmetric is far faster and is used for bulk data. Asymmetric is much slower and is used mainly for key exchange and digital signatures.

Which type encrypts large amounts of data?

Symmetric encryption (for example AES). Asymmetric is too slow for large volumes.

Why does TLS use both?

TLS uses asymmetric encryption to exchange a shared symmetric session key, then uses fast symmetric encryption for the actual data — combining safe key exchange with speed.

How many keys does each use?

Symmetric uses one shared secret key. Asymmetric uses a matched public/private key pair.